US v. Ryan Dixon, No. 15-7444 (4th Cir. 2015)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7444 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. RYAN LAMAR DIXON, a/k/a Big Gee, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (3:11-cr-00686-CMC-1) Submitted: December 17, 2015 Decided: December 22, 2015 Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ryan Lamar Dixon, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Barrett Taylor, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Ryan Lamar Dixon appeals the district court’s order denying Dixon’s motion to reconsider the court’s prior order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Dixon, No. 3:11-cr-00686-CMC-1 (D.S.C. Aug. 27, 2015); see also United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir. 2010) (district court is without authority to reconsider ruling on a § 3582(c)(2) motion). oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts and materials legal before We dispense with contentions this court are and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.