Rorie Wilson v. CBS Corporation, No. 15-2582 (4th Cir. 2016)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2582 RORIE N. WILSON, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. CBS CORPORATION, f/k/a Electric Corporation, Viacom, Inc., f/k/a Westinghouse Defendant – Appellee, and AC&S, INC.; AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC.; C.E. THURSTON & SONS, INC.; COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC.; DANA CORPORATION, Individually & As a Successor in Liability to Smith Kanzler; THE FLINTKOTE CO.; GENERAL REFRACTORIES COMPANY; GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION; HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES CORP.; HONEYWELL, INC., agent of Allied-Signal, Inc. (Formerly Allied Corporation) Successor-in-Interest to Bendix Corporation; HOPEMAN BROTHERS, INC.; INTERNATIONAL MINERALS & CHEMICAL CORP., now known as I.M.C. Corporation; INTERNATIONAL PAPER CORPORATION, f/k/a Champion International Corporation, f/k/a U.S. Plywood Corp. & Champion Papers, Inc.; OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC.; RAPID AMERICAN CORPORATION; SELBY, BATTERSBY & CO., now known as SB Decking, Inc.; UNIROYAL, INC.; WACO INSULATION, INC., now known as Waco, Inc.; GARLOCK, INC.; GENERAL ELECTRIC CO.; METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO., Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert J. Krask, Magistrate Judge. (4:14-cv-00091-RJK) Submitted: October 6, 2016 Decided: November 21, 2016 Before KING, FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Paul A. Weykamp, LAW OFFICES OF PAUL A. WEYKAMP, Hunt Valley, Maryland, for Appellant. Patricia Bugg Turner, Henry N. Ware, Jr., Elizabeth Scott Turner, SPOTTS FAIN PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Rorie N. Wilson appeals the magistrate judge’s orders excluding the testimony of Wilson’s expert witness and granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellee. record and find no reversible error. the reasons Corp., No. dispense stated the are oral argument adequately Accordingly, we affirm for magistrate 4:14-cv-00091-RJK with contentions by (E.D. We have reviewed the judge. Va. because presented in Nov. the the Wilson v. CBS 19, 2015). We facts and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.