Michael Ruth v. City of Creedmoor, No. 15-1745 (4th Cir. 2015)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1745 MICHAEL RUTH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CITY OF CREEDMOOR; ROBERT G. MORRIS, in his official and individual capacities; JOHN DOES 1-10, in their official and individual capacities, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (5:13-cv-00862-BR) Submitted: November 10, 2015 Decided: November 30, 2015 Before KING and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Ruth, Appellant Pro Se. Dan M. Hartzog, Jr., CRANFILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Michael Ruth appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Defendants in his civil action. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We have Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Ruth v. City of Creedmoor, No. 5:13-cv-00862-BR (E.D.N.C. June 30, 2015). dispense We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. with contentions are oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts We and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.