Anthony Robles-Telas v. Warden Terry O'Brien, No. 14-7056 (4th Cir. 2014)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7056 ANTHONY ROBLES-TELAS, Petitioner - Appellant, v. WARDEN TERRY O’BRIEN, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judge. (2:14-cv-00015-JPB-JSK) Submitted: November 20, 2014 Decided: November 25, 2014 Before KING and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony Robles-Telas, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Anthony Robles-Telas, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) habeas petition. to a magistrate (2012). The district court referred this case judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Robles-Telas that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a to a district court order based upon the recommendation. The magistrate timely judge’s filing of specific recommendation is objections necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have noncompliance. Cir. been of the consequences of Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th 1985); see also Robles-Telas has waived objections warned after Thomas v. appellate receiving proper Arn, 474 review U.S. by 140 failing notice. (1985). to Accordingly, affirm the judgment of the district court. file we We deny Robles- Telas’ motion for transcripts at Government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal before contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.