Frankie Lordmaster v. Augusta Correctional Center, No. 14-6563 (4th Cir. 2014)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6563 FRANKIE JAE LORDMASTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. AUGUSTA CORRECTIONAL CENTER PERSONNEL; VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AGENTS; KITCHEN PERSONNEL; SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL; CFD HEARING PERSONNEL; POLICY MAKING PERSONNEL; CFD COMMITTEE; INSTITUTIONAL PROGRAM MANAGER; WARDEN, Defendants - Appellees. No. 14-6566 FRANKIE JAE LORDMASTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. AUGUSTA CORRECTIONAL CENTER PERSONNEL; VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AGENTS; OTHER AGENTS OF GOVERNMENT; LAW LIBRARY SECRETARY; LAW LIBRARY MANAGER; SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL; LAW LIBRARY HEARING PERSONNEL; POLICY MAKING PERSONNEL; LAW LIBRARY COMMITTEE; IPM; WARDEN, Defendants - Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, District Judge. (7:14-cv-00014-MFU-RSB; 7:14-cv-00021-MFU-RSB) Submitted: May 29, 2014 Decided: June 3, 2014 Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Frankie Jae LordMaster, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: In these consolidated cases, Frankie Jae LordMaster seeks to appeal the district court s orders dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaints for failure to comply with the court s orders and denying reconsideration. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). the find records affirm for and the no reasons reversible stated error. by the his motions for We have reviewed Accordingly, district we court. LordMaster v. Augusta Corr. Ctr. Personnel, Nos. 7:14-cv-00014MFU-RSB; 7:14-cv-00021-MFU-RSB (W.D. Va. filed Feb. 7, 2014 & entered Feb. 10, 2014; Apr. 10, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.