David Bach v. South Carolina Government, No. 14-1596 (4th Cir. 2014)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1596 DAVID BACH, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA Defender, GOVERNMENT; EDWARD CHRISCOE, Public Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (4:14-cv-00073-MGL) Submitted: October 2, 2014 Decided: December 31, 2014 Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Bach, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: David Bach appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint. to a magistrate (2012). judge The district court referred this case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Bach that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. The magistrate timely judge’s filing of specific recommendation is objections necessary to to a preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have noncompliance. been warned of the consequences of Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Bach has waived appellate review by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal before contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2