David Bach v. U.S. Government, No. 14-1595 (4th Cir. 2014)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1595 DAVID BACH, Plaintiff Appellant, v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (4:13-cv-03503-MGL) Submitted: October 2, 2014 Decided: October 22, 2014 Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Bach, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: David Bach appeals the district court s order denying relief on his complaint. to a magistrate (2012). judge The district court referred this case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Bach that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. The magistrate timely judge s filing of specific recommendation is objections necessary to to a preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have noncompliance. been warned of the consequences Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). has waived of appellate review by failing to file Bach objections. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal before contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.