Bryant Moore v. Lightstorm Entertainment, Inc., No. 14-1135 (4th Cir. 2014)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1135 BRYANT MOORE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LIGHTSTORM ENTERTAINMENT, INC.; CENTURY FOX FILM CORPORATION, JAMES CAMERON; TWENTIETH Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, Senior District Judge. (8:11-cv-03644-RWT) Submitted: November 26, 2014 Before KING and Circuit Judge. THACKER, Circuit Decided: Judges, December 5, 2014 and DAVIS, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bruce S. Rogow, Tara A. Campion, BRUCE S. ROGOW, PA, Fort Lauderdale, Florida; Bradley A. Thomas, THE LAW OFFICE OF BRADLEY A. THOMAS, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Robert H. Rotstein, MITCHELL SILBERBERG & KNUPP LLP, Los Angeles, California, J. Matthew Williams, MITCHELL SILBERBERG & KNUPP LLP, Washington, D.C, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Bryant Moore appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellees on Moore’s claims of copyright infringement. and find no reversible error. We have reviewed the record Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See generally Moore v. Lightstorm Entm’t, Inc., 992 F. Supp. 2d 543 (D. Md. 2014). dispense with contentions are oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts We and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.