US v. Bruce Richardson, No. 13-8050 (4th Cir. 2014)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-8050 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. BRUCE LEE RICHARDSON, a/k/a Chino, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Bryson City. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (2:06-cr-00010-MR-1) Submitted: March 27, 2014 Before MOTZ, Circuit Circuit Judges. Judge, Decided: and HAMILTON and April 1, 2014 DAVIS, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bruce Lee Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Donald David Gast, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Bruce orders Lee denying his Richardson motion have appeals district compel to the and his the record motion and for reconsideration. We reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. reviewed court s find See United States v. Richardson, No. 2:06-cr-00010-MR-1 (W.D.N.C. June 11, 2013; Dec. 2, 2013). dispense with contentions are oral no argument adequately because presented in the the facts We and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.