US v. Paul Scinto, Sr., No. 13-8034 (4th Cir. 2014)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-8034 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff Appellee, v. PAUL SCINTO, SR., a/k/a Chemist, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (4:01-cr-00059-H-1) Submitted: March 27, 2014 Before MOTZ, Circuit Circuit Judges. Judge, Decided: and HAMILTON and April 1, 2014 DAVIS, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Paul Scinto, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Paul Scinto, Sr., appeals the district court s orders denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis and denying his motion for reconsideration. find no reversible error. We have reviewed the record and Accordingly, reasons stated by the district court. No. 4:01-cr-00059-H-1 dispense with contentions are oral (E.D.N.C. argument adequately affirm for the United States v. Scinto, Oct. 15 because presented we in & the the 30, 2013). We facts and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.