Eddie Gamble, Sr. v. Vernessa Craddock, No. 13-7735 (4th Cir. 2014)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-7735 EDDIE GAMBLE, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. VERNESSA CRADDOCK, Defendant Appellee, and L. T. WRIGHT, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:11-ct-03176-FL) Submitted: February 27, 2014 Decided: March 5, 2014 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eddie Gamble, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lockridge, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Butner, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Eddie Gamble, Sr., appeals the district court s orders dismissing without prejudice his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), and reconsideration. We reviewed reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated have by the district court. (E.D.N.C. Gamble s May 28, motion to 2013 denying the his record motions and for find no Gamble v. Craddock, No. 5:11-ct-03176-FL & Aug. expedite and 21, 2013). dispense We deny as moot with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.