Mark Corrigan v. Ms. Atkins, No. 13-7183 (4th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-7183 MARK R. CORRIGAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MS. ATKINS; MS. BOLLOT; DOCTOR CERVI; PITT COUNTY; WILSON COUNTY; SARGEANT CLIFFORD BAILEY; OFFICER JESSIE BARNES; HOWARD ADAMS; DIANA CARMACK; KATHARINA DEWALD, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (5:98-ct-00667-BR) Submitted: November 19, 2013 Before WYNN and Circuit Judge. FLOYD, Circuit Decided: November 22, 2013 Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mark R. Corrigan, Appellant Pro Se. Tommy Willis Jarrett, DEES, SMITH, POWELL, JARRETT, DEES & JONES, Goldsboro, North Carolina; Francisco Joseph Benzoni, John D. Madden, SMITH, ANDERSON, BLOUNT, DORSETT, MITCHELL & JERNIGAN, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina; Julie Baxter Bradburn, Kristen Yarbrough Riggs, WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, Raleigh, North Carolina; Dieter Mauch, HEDRICK, MURRAY, BRYSON, KENNETT, MAUCH & CONNOR, PLLC, Durham, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Mark R. Corrigan appeals the district court s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(3) motion for reconsideration of the court s 2002 order granting Appellees motion for summary judgment and action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. dismissing Corrigan s 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 (2006) district Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the court. Corrigan (E.D.N.C. July 9, 2013). v. Atkins, No. 5:98-ct-00667-BR We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3