Paul Seelig v. Alvin Keller, No. 13-7121 (4th Cir. 2014)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-7121 PAUL E. SEELIG, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ALVIN KELLER; ROBERT LEWIS; PAULA SMITH; GIBBS; MARK SCHUMAN; JAMES WIGGINS; DR. BELL; M. CRUDUP, Correctional Officer; MCRAE, Correctional Officer; JOHN DOE 1-100, Correctional Officer; JANE DOE 1 - 100, Correctional Officer; ELIZABETH THOMPSON; NINA SEALS; ALPHONSIA D. COGDELL; JOHN D. FLOYD; MACRE CRIDER; SERGEANT KUHN, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:11-ct-03243-BO) Submitted: January 24, 2014 Decided: February 11, 2014 Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Paul E. Seelig, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Andrew Regulski, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina; Francisco Joseph Benzoni, Timothy Power Lehan, SMITH, ANDERSON, BLOUNT, DORSETT, MITCHELL & JERNIGAN, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Paul dismissing without E. his 42 remedies. prejudice Seelig appeals U.S.C. for § 1983 failure the district (2006) to civil exhaust court s order rights action administrative error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible district Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the (E.D.N.C. court. June 14, Seelig 2013). v. Keller, We dispense No. with 5:11-ct-03243-BO oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.