Quintin Littlejohn v. US, No. 13-6722 (4th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-6722 QUINTIN M. LITTLEJOHN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, with all agents in active concert both individually and in their official capacity, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. (6:13-cv-00369-JMC) Submitted: August 29, 2013 Decided: September 4, 2013 Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Quintin Littlejohn, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Quintin Littlejohn appeals the district court s order denying relief on his civil complaint. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(b)(1)(B) (West 2006 & Supp. 2013). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Littlejohn that failure to file specific, timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. The magistrate timely judge s filing of specific recommendation is objections necessary to to a preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have noncompliance. Cir. 1985); Littlejohn warned of the consequences of Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th see has been also waived Thomas v. appellate Arn, 474 review U.S. by 140 failing specific objections after receiving proper notice. (1985). to file Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal before contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.