Arthur Rodgers v. Bobby Shearin, No. 13-6500 (4th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-6500 ARTHUR RODGERS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BOBBY SHEARIN; SERGEANT SIRES; OFFICER STEVENS; LIEUTENANT WILT; OFFICER MALLOW; OFFICER RALEY; GREG FLURY, Physician s Assistant, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:11-cv-01585-CCB) Submitted: July 18, 2013 Decided: July 23, 2013 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Arthur Rodgers, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland; Michelle Jacquelyn Marzullo, Richard P. Seitz, MARKS, O NEILL, O BRIEN, DOHERTY & KELLY, P.C., Towson, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Arthur Rodgers appeals the district court s order granting Defendants motions for summary judgment and denying relief on Rodgers 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We have Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Rodgers v. 21, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal before Shearin, contentions this court No. 1:11-cv-01585-CCB are adequately and argument presented would not (D. in aid Md. the the Mar. materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.