US v. Antonio Lewis, No. 13-6227 (4th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-6227 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ANTONIO CHESTER LEWIS, a/k/a Big Tony, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (3:05-cr-00107-JAG-1) Submitted: April 25, 2013 Before AGEE and Circuit Judge. WYNN, Circuit Decided: April 30, 2013 Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Antonio Chester Lewis, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Wu, Assistant United States Attorney, Erik Sean Siebert, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Antonio order denying Chester his 18 Lewis U.S.C. appeals the § 3582(c)(2) district (2006) court s motion for reduction in his sentence based on Amendment 750 to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual (2010). We conclude that the district court properly determined that Lewis was ineligible for a sentence reduction because his sentencing range was determined by his career offender designation, not the drug quantities attributable to him, and thus was not impacted by Amendment 750. United States Accordingly, States v. 2013). legal before v. Munn, we affirm Lewis, No. 595 the F.3d 183, district 187 (4th court s 3:05-cr-00107-JAG-1 Cir. order. (E.D. Va. 2010). United Jan. 31, We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.