James Brawner v. Leroy Cartledge, No. 13-6066 (4th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-6066 JAMES RANDALL BRAWNER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LEROY CARTLEDGE, sued in his individual capacity; STEVEN LEWIS; J. PARKER, sued in his individual capacity; FRANK MURSIER, sued in his individual capacity; HARRISON, sued in his individual capacity; JAMES SLIGH, sued in his individual capacity; DENNIS PATTERSON, sued in his individual capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (5:12-cv-01889-RMG-KDW) Submitted: March 26, 2013 Decided: March 29, 2013 Before DUNCAN, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Randall Brawner, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Lindemann, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: James Randall Brawner appeals the district court s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying his motion for a preliminary injunction. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. we affirm for the reasons stated by the We have Accordingly, district court. Brawner v. Cartledge, No. 5:12-cv-01889-RMG-KDW (D.S.C. Dec. 28, 2012). legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2