US v. Steven Carr, No. 13-6005 (4th Cir. 2013)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-6005 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. STEVEN DONEWAN CARR, a/k/a Steven D. Carr, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (5:98-cr-00246-RLV-2) Submitted: February 21, 2013 Before AGEE and Circuit Judge. DAVIS, Circuit Decided: Judges, and February 26, 2013 HAMILTON, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Steven Donewan Carr, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Steven Donewan Carr appeals the district court s order denying his motion for reconsideration of its order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence reduction. * Because the district court lacked the authority to reconsider its disposition States v. affirm Goodwyn, the States v. 2012). legal of Carr s 596 district Carr, F.3d court s No. § 3582(c)(2) 233, 235 36 denial of 5:98 cr 00246 RLV 2 motion, (4th see Cir. relief. United 2010), See (W.D.N.C. we United Dec. 14, We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid in the decisional process. AFFIRMED * Although the district court granted Carr s § 3582(c)(2) motion, the reduction granted by the court did not reduce Carr s sentence to the full extent he requested. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
