Mamoudou Diallo v. Eric Holder, Jr., No. 13-2463 (4th Cir. 2014)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2463 MAMOUDOU DIALLO; AISSATA L. DIALLO, Petitioners, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: March 6, 2014 Decided: March 18, 2014 Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mamoudou Diallo, Aissata L. Diallo, Petitioners Pro Se. Daniel Eric Goldman, Rebecca Hoffberg Phillips, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Mamoudou Diallo and his wife, Aissata Lamarana Diallo, natives and citizens of Guinea, petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ( Board ) dismissing their appeal from the immigration judge s denial of their requests for asylum, withholding of removal Convention Against Torture. and withholding under the We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the documents submitted with the motion to reopen and the supporting affidavits. We conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the administrative findings of fact, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and decision. that substantial evidence supports the Board s See INS v. Elias Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992). We further conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to remand. See Hussain v. Gonzales, 477 F.3d 153, 155 (4th Cir. 2007). Accordingly, dispense with contentions are oral we deny argument adequately the petition because presented in the the for facts review. We and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.