Sheri Daniel v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 13-2426 (4th Cir. 2014)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2426 SHERI DANIEL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; BANK OF AMERICA, NA; U.S. BANK, N.A., As SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE to BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. (SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO LASALLE BANK N.A.) As TRUSTEE FOR MORGAN STANLEY MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2006-11.; BWW LAW GROUP, LLC; EQUITY TRUSTEES, LLC; GEMINI TITLE & ESCROW, LLC, d/b/a Gemini Title Reo, LLC, d/b/a Parker, Simon, Kokolis, LLC; TUTT, TAYLOR & RANKIN, LLC, d/b/a Sotheby s International Realty, LLC, Jeremy Browne, Salesperson/Realtor; FAHMEY ABDELATEY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:13-cv-00612-GBL-IDD) Submitted: April 29, 2014 Before SHEDD and Circuit Judge. DIAZ, Decided: Circuit Judges, and May 9, 2014 HAMILTON, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sheri Daniel, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Sanborn Owen, BRIGLIAHUNDLEY, PC, Fairfax, Virginia; Thomas Jonathan Kokolis, PARKER SIMON & KOKOLIS LLC, Rockville, Maryland; Mikhael David Charnoff, PERRY CHARNOFF PLLC, Arlington, Virginia; Christopher Clayton Nolan, NOLAN, MROZ & MCCORMICK, Vienna, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Sheri dismissing, Daniel pursuant appeals to the Federal district Rule of court s Civil order Procedure 12(b)(6), her state-law claims of fraud, intentional infliction of emotional distress, unjust enrichment, and quiet title. She also appeals the denial of her motion for leave to file a second amended complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We Accordingly, we affirm the district court s judgment. dispense contentions with are oral argument adequately because presented in the facts and the materials legal before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.