Vernon Leftridge v. Michael Matthews, No. 13-2268 (4th Cir. 2014)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2268 VERNON J. LEFTRIDGE, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JOHN DOE, K-9 Officer Wicomico County; JOHN DOE, Over-theair Communication Officer Wicomico County; JOHN DOE, Internal Affairs Officer of Wicomico County; JOHN DOE, in his individual capacity and official capacity as a law enforcement officer of Wicomico County Sheriff s Department; JOHN DOE, Internal Affairs Officer of Wicomico County; JOHN DOE, Dispatch Officer of Wicomico County; JOHN DOE, Dispatch Officer of Wicomico County; JOHN DOE, Maryland State Trooper; JOHN DOE, Maryland State Trooper; JANE DOE, Internal Affairs Officer Wicomico County; JOHN DOE, Salisbury Police Officer; MICHAEL KELLY MATTHEWS; BENJAMIN CHARLES PARSONS; HOWARD LEE BOWDEN; JANE DOE, Salisbury Police Officer, Defendants Appellees, and MICHAEL LEWIS, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. (1:11-cv-03499-ELH) Submitted: March 28, 2014 Decided: April 8, 2014 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Vernon J. Leftridge, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Vernon J. Leftridge, Jr., appeals the district court s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. the record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Leftridge v. Matthews, No. 1:11-cv-03499-ELH (D. Md. filed Sept. 30, 2013, entered Oct. 1, 2013; filed Oct. 10, 2013, entered Oct. 11, 2013). legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.