Cynthia Phillips v. Raytheon Applied Signal Technology, No. 13-2243 (4th Cir. 2014)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2243 CYNTHIA PHILLIPS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RAYTHEON APPLIED SIGNAL TECHNOLOGY, INC., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. (1:11-cv-03230-ELH) Submitted: February 20, 2014 Decided: February 25, 2014 Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Cynthia Phillips, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Frier Wiltsie, HUNTON & WILLIAMS, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Cynthia dismissing her Phillips complaint appeals alleging the district employment court s order discrimination. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Phillips informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court s disposition, Phillips has forfeited appellate review of the court s order. judgment. Accordingly, we affirm the district court s Phillips v. Raytheon Applied Signal Tech., Inc., No. 1:11-cv-03230-ELH (D. Md. Sept. 27, 2013). oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts and materials We dispense with legal contentions are before this and court argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.