Pascal Kouadio v. Eric Holder, Jr., No. 13-1879 (4th Cir. 2014)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1879 PASCAL KOUADIO, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: January 17, 2014 Decided: January 31, 2014 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Petition dismissed in part; denied in part by unpublished per curiam opinion. Godwill C. Tachi, TACHI LAW FIRM, LLC, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Petitioner. Stuart F. Delery, Assistant Attorney General, William C. Peachey, Assistant Director, Mona Maria Yousif, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Pascal Coast, Kouadio, petitions for a native review of and an citizen order of of the the Ivory Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the administrative record and Kouadio s contentions and find that we lack jurisdiction over the claims challenging Kouadio the failed Board s to order file a of timely March 19, petition Stone v. INS, 514 U.S. 386, 405 (1995). 2013, for from which review. See Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for review in part with respect to those claims. Next, after reviewing Kouadio s claims relative to the instant order under review, we conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reconsider. ยง 1003.2(a) (2013). See 8 C.F.R. We therefore deny the petition for review in part for the reasons stated by the Board. (B.I.A. June 14, 2013). See In re: Kouadio We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DISMISSED IN PART; DENIED IN PART 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.