Daniel Willis v. Town of Trenton, No. 13-1863 (4th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1863 DANIEL J. WILLIS, Plaintiff Appellant, v. TOWN OF TRENTON AND ITS OFFICIALS; MAYOR DARLENE SPIVEY; DANNY BLACKWELL; ROBERT HORVATH; CHARLES C. JONES, JR., Council Member; GLENN SPIVEY, Town clerk and Jones County School Board and its members; MICHAEL BRACEY, Superintendent; BILLY GRIFFIN; CHARLES GRAY; MARY HALL; BARRY JONES; LARRY WALSTON; LUVENIA FOSTER, Administrative Assistant and Liaison Officer as Board Members; JONES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS; FRANKY HOWARD, County Manager; FRANK EMORY, Chairman; W. MICHAEL HADDOCK; SONDRA RIGGS; JOSEPH WIGGINS; ZACK KOONCE, III, Commissioner; JENNIFER KING, Clerk to the Board, and/or their Successors, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (4:13-mc-00004-H) Submitted: October 22, 2013 Decided: October 24, 2013 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Daniel Johnson Willis, Appellant Pro Se. Kathleen Tanner Kennedy, THARRINGTON SMITH LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Daniel Johnson Willis appeals the district court s order denying authorization to file his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. Willis is required to file a motion for leave to file a complaint under a pre-filing injunction imposed by this court and the district court. find no reversible reasons stated Trenton, No. dispense with contentions by error. the Accordingly, district 4:13-mc-00004-H are oral We have reviewed the record and argument adequately we court. (E.D.N.C. because presented in affirm Willis June the the v. for the Town of 18, 2013). We facts and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.