Aaron Holsey v. Corless Alston, No. 13-1837 (4th Cir. 2013)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1837 AARON HOLSEY, Plaintiff Appellant, v. CORLESS ALSTON, individually and as acting deputy director of the Department of Rental and Assisted Housing; D. MILLER-FORD, individually and as a staff member of the Housing Authority of Baltimore City; PAUL T. GRAZIANO, individually and as executive director of the Housing Authority of Baltimore City; ERICA MANCE, individually and as property manager of Belleview Manchester Apartments; FELICIA MARTIN, individually and as office manager for the CSI Support and Development Services (Coop); BRANDON MOSS, individually and as building liaison for the CSI Support and Development Services (Coop); CHERYL ROSS, individually and as regional manager for the CSI Support and Development Services (Coop); MONIQUE STARK, individually and as senior building accountant for the CSI Support and Development Services (Coop); CSI SUPPORT AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES (COOP); THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF BALTIMORE CITY, Defendants - Appellees, and THE TOWNER MANAGEMENT COMPANY; D AND L REPORTING SERVICES, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. George L. Russell, III, District Judge. (1:13-cv-00994-GLR) Submitted: November 4, 2013 Decided: November 21, 2013 Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Aaron Holsey, Appellant Pro Se. Carrie Blackburn Riley, Baltimore, Maryland; Nathan Daniel Adler, Brian M. Boyle, NEUBERGER, QUINN, GIELEN, RUBIN & GIBBER, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Aaron Holsey seeks to appeal the district court s order granting in part and denying in part Holsey s motion for an extension of time to respond to the Defendants motions to dismiss. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 54546 (1949). The order Holsey seeks to appeal is neither a final order an nor appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. dispense with contentions are oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts We and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
