Earl Barnett v. U.S. Attorney General, No. 13-1604 (4th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1604 EARL BARNETT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Department of Justice; FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (1:11-cv-00203-IMK-JSK) Submitted: July 26, 2013 Decided: August 13, 2013 Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Earl Barnett, Appellant Pro Se. Jarod James Douglas, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Earl Barnett appeals the district court s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge as modified and granting alternative, employment Defendants for summary discrimination motion to judgment, action dismiss and with or, dismissing in Barnett s prejudice. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. the We have Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Barnett v. U.S. Attorney Gen., No. 1:11-cv-00203-IMK-JSK (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 20, 2013). facts and materials legal before We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately this and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.