Carol Dalenko v. News and Observer Publishing, No. 13-1075 (4th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1075 CAROL DALENKO, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NEWS AND OBSERVER PUBLISHING COMPANY, d/b/a The News and Observer, Defendant Appellee, and ORAGE QUARLES, III, President & Publisher, by and through:; H. HUGH STEVENS, JR., d/b/a Everett, Gaskins, Hancock & Stevens, LLP, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:10-cv-00184-H) Submitted: June 13, 2013 Decided: Before NIEMEYER, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. June 17, 2013 Carol Dalenko, Appellant Pro Se. Carolyn Amanda Martin, Michael J. Tadych, STEVENS MARTIN VAUGHN & TADYCH, PLLC, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Carol Dalenko appeals the district court s order denying her motion to reopen and to amend her complaint and the order denying vacate. error. her motions for findings and to amend and to We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dalenko v. News & Observer Publ g Co., No. 5:10-cv-00184-H (E.D.N.C. June 13, 2012; Jan. 15, 2013). We grant We the dispense motion with contentions are to oral replace argument adequately the informal because presented in the the reply facts brief. and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.