Juan Carrero-Vasquez v. Gregg Hershberger, No. 12-8099 (4th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-8099 JUAN CARRERO-VASQUEZ, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MR. GREGG L. HERSHBERGER, (Warden) R.C.I.; MEDICAL DEPT. OF ROXBURY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; P.A. CRYSTAL SWECKER; MR. GREG DAVIS, Health Service Administrator; DR. JONATHAN THOMPSON; MRS. MARY WESTFALL, Regional Director of Nursing; MRS. STACEY KING; MRS. MARCY MCDOWELL-DUDDY, Consulting HSA; MR. SALIK ALI, Regional Medical Director; MEDICAL DEPT. OF JESSUP CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; P. A. MOSS; NURSE JEFF; CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES (COMPANY), Corporate Headquarters; OPERATIONS HEADQUARTER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:12-cv-01264-RDB) Submitted: May 30, 2013 Decided: Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. June 4, 2013 Juan Carrero-Vasquez, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith LaneWeber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland; Jennifer E. Cameron, Michelle Jacquelyn Marzullo, Benjamin L. Davis, III, MARKS, O NEILL, O BRIEN, DOHERTY & KELLY, P.C., Towson, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Juan Carrero-Vasquez appeals the district court s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Carrero-Vasquez v. Hershberger, No. (D. Md. Nov. 5, 2012; Dec. 13, 2012). 1:12-cv-01264-RDB We deny Carrero-Vasquez s motion to compel and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and materials legal before contentions are adequately this and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.