Kenneth Sweeting v. M. Stanford, No. 12-7791 (4th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7791 KENNETH SWEETING, Plaintiff Appellant, v. M. STANFORD, Head Nurse; DR. REPKO, doctor); DR. THOMPSON, Head Doctor, Optometrist (eye Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (7:11-cv-00334-NKM-RSB) Submitted: March 14, 2013 Decided: April 3, 2013 Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kenneth Sweeting, Appellant Pro Se. Carlene Booth Johnson, PERRY LAW FIRM, PC, Dillwyn, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM Kenneth Sweeting appeals the district court s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. have reviewed the record and find no reversible We error. Accordingly, we deny Sweeting s motions to appoint counsel and to compel return of legal materials and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sweeting v. M. Stanford, No. 7:11-cv-00334-NKM-RSB (W.D. Va. Sept. 25, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.