Michael Schulze v. Dwight Ratley, No. 12-7771 (4th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7771 MICHAEL F. SCHULZE, Plaintiff Appellant, and GERARDO GONZALEZ, Plaintiff, v. DWIGHT C. RATLEY; SHANNON D. DAVIS; GERALD M. DEL RE; JAMES A. EDWARDS; PAMELA D. MAJOR; RAYMOND A. SIMMONS; DARLENE DREW; UNKNOWN OFFICERS, of the Federal Prisons; FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; J. COMSTOCK; ANDERSON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (6:11-cv-00941-JFA) Submitted: March 19, 2013 Decided: April 2, 2013 Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael F. Schulze, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Michael F. Schulze appeals the district court s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting Defendants motion for summary judgment in this action filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), and the court s order denying reconsideration. no reversible error. We have reviewed the record and find Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Schulze v. Ratley, No. 6:11-cv- 00941-JFA (D.S.C. Sept. 11, 2012; Oct. 10, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.