Nathaniel Singleton v. Warden Rivera, No. 12-7085 (4th Cir. 2012)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7085 NATHANIEL SINGLETON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WARDEN RIVERA; ASSOCIATE WARDEN WEIR; ASSIST WITTMAN; DR. PHILLIPES; COMMANDER GLENN; COMMANDER BRADY; MR. AGRLINE; D. COUICK; OFFICER MS. VENTON; OFFICER MS. JOHNSON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (1:10-cv-01909-RBH) Submitted: November 20, 2012 Before TRAXLER, Judges. Chief Judge, Decided: November 26, 2012 and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Nathaniel Singleton, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Nathaniel Singleton appeals the district court s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Singleton v. Warden Rivera, No. 1:10-cv-01909-RBH (D.S.C. June 12, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.