US v. Keiron Bryant, No. 12-7034 (4th Cir. 2012)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7034 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. KEIRON WAYNE BRYANT, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:05-cr-00082-AWA-JEB-1) Submitted: November 20, 2012 Before TRAXLER, Judges. Chief Judge, Decided: November 26, 2012 and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Keiron Wayne Bryant, Appellant Pro Se. Darryl James Mitchell, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Keiron Wayne Bryant appeals the district court s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion to reduce his sentence Guidelines conclude pursuant Manual the to Amendment (2010). district We court 750 have to the reviewed properly found U.S. Sentencing the record and it lacked the authority to reduce Bryant s 120-month sentence, which was the statutory mandatory minimum. See United States v. Munn, 595 F.3d 183, 187 (4th Cir. 2010) ( [A] defendant who was convicted of a crack offense but sentenced pursuant to a mandatory statutory minimum sentence is ineligible for a reduction under § 3582(c)(2). ). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Bryant, No. 2:05- cr-00082-AWA-JEB-1 (E.D. Va. May 30, 2012). oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts and materials We dispense with legal contentions are before this and court argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
