Bereano v. United States, No. 12-6417 (4th Cir. 2013)
Annotate this CasePetitioner appealed from the district court's denial of his petition for a writ of coram nobis, filed pursuant to the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. 1651(a). The petition alleged that the Supreme Court's decision in Skilling v. United States required vacatur of petitioner's 1994 mail fraud convictions in the District of Maryland. The district court concluded that no relief could be granted even though petitioner's honest services fraud scheme did not involve bribery or kickbacks. Because petitioner would not be entitled to relief on direct appeal under Skilling, the court concluded that the fourth prerequisite for coram nobis relief - identification of "an error of the most fundamental character" - was not satisfied. Accordingly, an award of the "extraordinary" remedy of coram nobis relief was unwarranted.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.