US v. Charles Burke, No. 12-4731 (4th Cir. 2013)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-4731 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CHARLES RICHARD BURKE, a/k/a Rick, a/k/a D , a/k/a Detroit Rick, a/k/a Hasim Coleman, a/k/a Rick Calloway, a/k/a Jihad Alexander, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (3:10-cr-00224-1) Submitted: May 17, 2013 Decided: June 6, 2013 Before DAVIS, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael D. Payne, REDMAN & PAYNE, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. R. Booth Goodwin II, United States Attorney, R. Gregory McVey, Assistant United States Attorney, Huntington, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Charles Richard Burke appeals his sentence of 236 months of imprisonment following his guilty plea to conspiracy to distribute oxycodone and 280 grams or more of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (2006). Burke contends that the district court erred in determining that his prior state and federal felony drug convictions are separate sentences under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual ( USSG ) § 4A1.2(a)(2) (2011), and, consequently, incorrectly offender under USSG § 4B1.1(a). In assessing a classified him as a career We affirm. challenge to the district court s application of the Guidelines, we review the district court s factual findings for clear error and its legal conclusions de novo. United States v. Perez, 609 F.3d 609, 612 (4th Cir. 2010). Pursuant to USSG § 4A1.2(a)(2), [p]rior sentences always are counted separately if the sentences were imposed for offenses that were separated by an intervening arrest . . . . USSG § 4A1.2(a)(2). In the absence of an intervening arrest, prior sentences are counted separately unless (A) the sentences resulted from offenses contained in the same charging instrument; or (B) the sentences were imposed on the same day. Id. Accordingly, where a defendant, like Burke, has been sentenced on different days for federal and state crimes charged 2 in separate indictments, those convictions are properly counted as separate sentences under § 4B1.1. See United States v. Rooks, 596 F.3d 204, 212-13 (4th Cir. 2010) (explaining that defendant s state and federal convictions, for which he was indicted and sentenced separately, should be counted as separate offenses despite the fact that they arose from the same course of criminal conduct). We therefore find no error in Burke s classification as a career offender and affirm his sentence. We dispense with oral legal contentions are before this and argument adequately because presented in the the facts and materials court argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
