Michael Sindram v. Gerald Lee, No. 12-2445 (4th Cir. 2013)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2445 MICHAEL J. SINDRAM, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HON. GERALD BRUCE LEE, et al, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O Grady, District Judge. (1:12-mc-00041-LO-IDD) Submitted: February 21, 2013 Before AGEE and Circuit Judge. DAVIS, Circuit Decided: February 25, 2013 Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael J. Sindram, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Michael J. Sindram appeals from the district court s order denying his motions seeking leave to file a civil action and requesting a hearing. We affirm. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Sindram s informal brief does not challenge the district court s denial of his motion requesting a hearing, Sindram has forfeited appellate review of that ruling. With respect to the court s ruling denying Sindram s motions seeking leave to file, we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, reasons stated by the district court. we affirm for the Sindram v. Hon. Gerald Bruce Lee, et al, No. 1:12-mc-00041-LO-IDD (E.D. Va. Nov. 15, 2012). legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
