Reginald Lee v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, No. 12-2257 (4th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2257 REGINALD L. LEE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE; JAY A. DACKMAN, P.A.; ANTHONY J. DELAURENTIS, P.A.; WILLIAM M. O'CONNELL, P.A.; JOHN K. REIFF, P.A.; JACK E. REID; DELAURENTIS, REIFF & REID, LLC; RON SROKA, P.A.; BENJAMIN ZAJDEL; STANLEY ALPERT, P.A.; HEIDI S. KENNY, P.A.; KAREN M. AUTHEMENT, P.A.; MARY F. KEENAN, Assistant Solicitor; KYRIAKOS MARUDAS, Assistant Solicitor; A.J. BILLIG AUCTIONEERS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, District Judge. (1:12-cv-02418-JKB) Submitted: January 17, 2013 Decided: January 22, 2013 Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Reginald Lee, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Reginald L. Lee appeals the district court s order dismissing his civil complaint for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. find no reversible error. We have reviewed the record and Accordingly, reasons stated by the district court. we affirm for the Lee v. Mayor & City Council of Balt., No. 1:12-cv-02418-JKB (D. Md. filed Sept. 14, 2012; entered Sept. 17, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED D.C. Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462 (1983); Rooker v. Fid. Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413 (1923). 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.