Michael McNeil v. State of Maryland, No. 12-2139 (4th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2139 MICHAEL A. MCNEIL, Plaintiff Appellant, v. STATE OF MARYLAND; HOWARD COUNTY, Maryland; HOWARD COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT; DIANE O. LEASURE, Chief Administrative Judge, in her Official and Individual Capacity; LOUIS A. BECKER, III, Associate Judge, in his Official Capacity; MARY M. KRAMER, Master in Chancery, in her Official Capacity; LISA S. MOHINK, Family Law Coordinator, in her Official and Individual Capacity; PATRICIA BRIGHT, Court Social Worker, in her Official and Individual Capacity; CHRISTINIA BIEGANSKI, Supervised Visitation Center Manager, in her Official and Individual Capacity; SUSAN R. GNATT, Supervisory Court Reporter, in her Official and Individual Capacity; STEPHEN A. DRAZIN; PETER V. MARKUSKI, JR.; SARAH P. MCNEIL; VINCENT LOVE; M. SLUTSKY & ASSOCIATES, INC., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District Judge. (8:11-cv-02495-DKC) Submitted: January 17, 2013 Decided: January 22, 2013 Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael A. McNeil, Appellant Pro Se. Hugh Scott Curtis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland; Louis Paul Ruzzi, HOWARD COUNTY OFFICE OF LAW, Ellicott City, Maryland; Stephen A. Drazin, Columbia, Maryland; Jeffrey Wayne Bernstein, GOOZMAN, BERNSTEIN & MARKUSKI, Laurel, Maryland; Sarah P. McNeil, Ellicott City, Maryland; Timothy J. Mummert, Ferndale, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Michael A. McNeil appeals the district court s order denying relief related claims. reversible on his We error. 42 U.S.C. have § 1983 reviewed Accordingly, (2006) the although record we complaint and grant and find no leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McNeil v. Maryland, No. 8:11-cv-02495-DKC (D. Md. Aug. 22, 2012). We deny McNeil s motion to strike the Appellees briefs and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and materials legal before contentions are adequately this and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.