Charles Tisdale v. Barack Obama, No. 12-1124 (4th Cir. 2012)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1124 CHARLES TISDALE, Plaintiff Appellant, v. HONORABLE BARACK H. OBAMA, personally and in his official capacity as President of the United States; DON PALMER, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Virginia State Board of Elections; THE VIRGINIA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS; NEIL H. MACBRIDE, in his official capacity as United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia; FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, Defendants - Appellees. ------------------------MARIO APUZZO, Amicus Supporting Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (3:12-cv-00036-JAG) Submitted: May 31, 2012 Decided: Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. June 5, 2012 Charles Tisdale, Appellant Pro Se. Mario Apuzzo, MARIO APUZZO ATTORNEY AT LAW, Jamesburg, New Jersey, Amicus Supporting Appellant. David Brett Kolker, Associate General Counsel, FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Charles denying relief on Tisdale his 42 motion for an injunction. no reversible error. stated by the appeals U.S.C. the district § 1983 (2006) court s order complaint and We have reviewed the record and find Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons district court. Tisdale 3:12-cv-00036-JAG (E.D. Va. Jan. 23, 2012). v. Obama, No. We deny Tisdale s motions to expedite the appeal and for an injunction, and to recuse Judges Davis, Keenan, Wynn, Diaz, and Floyd. We grant the motion to file an amicus curiae brief and file it out of time. We deny all other pending motions filed by Tisdale. dispense with oral argument because the facts and We legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.