Capurso v. Gonzales, No. 06-1438 (4th Cir. 2006)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1438 MAURO CAPURSO, Petitioner, versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A95-885-986) Submitted: October 6, 2006 Decided: November 21, 2006 Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ralph J. DiPietro, THE LAW OFFICE OF RALPH J. DIPIETRO, P.C., Hyattsville, Maryland, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, James A. Hunolt, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Mauro Capurso, a native and citizen of Venezuela, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ( Board ) denying his motion to reopen immigration proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the Board s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2006). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See Capurso v. Gonzales, No. A95-885-986 (B.I.A. Mar. 15, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED - 2 -

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.