Evaristo Serrano Vargas v., No. 18-2104 (3d Cir. 2018)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DLD-231 NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ___________ No. 18-2104 ___________ IN RE: EVARISTO SERRANO VARGAS, Petitioner ____________________________________ On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania (Related to M.D. Pa. Civ. No. 3-17-cv-00801) ____________________________________ Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P. June 7, 2018 Before: JORDAN, SHWARTZ and KRAUSE, Circuit Judges (Opinion filed: June 12, 2018) _________ OPINION* _________ PER CURIAM Evaristo Serrano Vargas filed a petition for writ of mandamus requesting that we direct the District Court to rule on a petition that he had filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The District Court has since ruled on Serrano Vargas’s § 2241 petition. In light of the District Court’s action, the question Serrano Vargas presented is no longer a live * This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent. controversy, so we will dismiss his mandamus petition as moot. See, e.g., Lusardi v. Xerox Corp., 975 F.2d 964, 974 (3d Cir. 1992). 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.