Robinson v. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc., No. 17-3397 (3d Cir. 2019)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on January 29, 2019.
Download PDF
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 17-3397 QUITMAN ROBINSON v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC.; JANE DOE 1-100 New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc., Appellant (D.N.J. No. 2-14-cv-02679) Present: McKEE, RESTREPO, and FUENTES, Circuit Judges ORDER GRANTING PANEL REHEARING SUA SPONTE AND JUDGMENT ORDER On January 29, 2019, a panel of this Court (“Panel”) issued a decision (“Decision”) reversing the district court’s order of October 19, 2017, that had denied a motion by New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. (“NJ Transit”) to vacate a judgement entered in favor of Quitman Robinson (“Robinson”) in the amount of $824,152.59. The Panel held that NJ Transit had sovereign immunity from plaintiff’s claims that had been brought under the Federal Employers Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. § 51, et seq. (“FELA”). Robinson filed a petition for rehearing and/or rehearing en banc. On March 12, 2019, NJ Transit filed a motion to hold the case is abeyance while the parties discussed a global settlement. By order entered March 15, 2019, the case was held in abeyance. On June 26, 2019, New Jersey P.L.2019, c. 137 was enacted (“Act”), which provides that NJ Transit may not assert sovereign immunity as a defense to claims arising under certain federal statutes, including FELA. The Act was effective immediately and, by its terms, applies to actions against NJ Transit pending in any court of appeals, which would include this matter. In light of the passage of the Act, NJ Transit no longer possesses sovereign immunity from the claims Robinson has asserted against NJ Transit. Accordingly, it is hereby O R D E R E D that panel rehearing in this matter is granted sua sponte. The prior opinion and judgment are hereby VACATED. In light of the action by the panel appellee’s petition for rehearing and/or rehearing en banc is dismissed as moot. It is further O R D E R E D that the judgment in favor of plaintiff in the amount of $824,152.59 is affirmed by this Court, and the matter is remanded to the district court. By the Court, s/ L. Felipe Restrepo Circuit Judge Dated: August 29, 2019 cc: All Counsel of Record
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
