United States v. Caldwell, No. 13-1918 (3d Cir. 2014)
Annotate this CasePittsburgh detectives Emery, Smith, and Adametz were on patrol in an unmarked cruiser when they spotted Caldwell and Tigney walking side-by-side. When the car turned left, Emery observed Caldwell remove a firearm from his waistband and hold it behind Tigney’s back. Emery stopped the cruiser, jumped out, ran to the rear of the car, drew his weapon, and yelled: “Police. Drop the gun.” Caldwell released the firearm, letting it fall to the ground between Tigney’s legs. The other detectives placed the two in handcuffs. Caldwell insisted that he was not the one who had been holding the gun. Smith testified that he saw Caldwell “brandish” the weapon and later drop it behind Tigney’s back. Adametz testified that his view of Caldwell was obstructed, but that both of Tigney’s hands were visible and empty when the gun fell. Caldwell was a convicted felon, not permitted to possess a firearm. The detectives transported him for processing. Tigney falsely identified himself and was released. Tigney later told officers that the gun had fallen from his pants and that Caldwell did not know about the gun, but subsequently asserted his Fifth Amendment privilege not to testify. Convicted under 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(1), Caldwell appealed, claiming that the court erroneously admitted evidence that he had prior convictions for unlawful firearm possession and improperly excluded a Tigney’s out-of-court statement. The Third Circuit vacated, holding that admission of Caldwell’s prior convictions was improper.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.