In re: Ulysses Cannon, No. 19-12533 (11th Cir. 2019)
Annotate this CaseThe Eleventh Circuit granted petitioner's application for leave to file a second or successive motion as to his 18 U.S.C. 924(o) conviction for Count 3, because petitioner made a prima facie showing that his claim satisfied the statutory criteria of 28 U.S.C. 2255(h)(2) on the basis that his Count 3 conviction may implicate section 924(c)(3)(B)'s residual clause and United States v. Davis. However, the court denied the application as to petitioner's section 924(c) convictions for Counts 6 and 14, because he has failed to make a prima facie showing that he was entitled to relief under Davis.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.