Stacy Burke v. Postmaster General, et al., No. 17-11046 (11th Cir. 2018)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Case: 17-11046 Date Filed: 04/12/2018 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 17-11046 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 5:16-cv-00090-RH-GRJ STACY BURKE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus POSTMASTER GENERAL, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Defendants - Appellees. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida ________________________ (April 12, 2018) Before WILSON, JORDAN, and HIGGINBOTHAM,* 1Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *Honorable Patrick E. Higginbotham, United States Circuit Judge for the Fifth Circuit, sitting by designation. Case: 17-11046 Date Filed: 04/12/2018 Page: 2 of 2 We have considered all of Stacey Burke’s specifications of error. We have reviewed de novo the following: 1. Did the district court err in granting the Postal Service’s motion for judgment as a matter of law on the race discrimination claim? 2. Did the district court err in granting the Postal Service’s motion for judgment as a matter of law on the retaliation claim? After careful review of the briefs and the record, and having the benefit of oral argument, we find no reversible error. The decision of the district court is AFFIRMED. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
