USA v. Cresencio Juarez Ramiro, No. 16-17672 (11th Cir. 2018)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Case: 16-17672 Date Filed: 05/11/2018 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 16-17672 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:14-cr-00173-WSD-LTW-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CRESENCIO JUAREZ RAMIRO, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia ________________________ (May 11, 2018) Before TJOFLAT, WILLIAM PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Robert Alan Glickman, appointed counsel for Cresencio Juarez Ramiro in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Case: 16-17672 Date Filed: 05/11/2018 Page: 2 of 2 the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Ramiro’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.