USA v. Stacie E. Leipold, No. 15-15683 (11th Cir. 2016)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Case: 15-15683 Date Filed: 12/15/2016 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 15-15683 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 4:15-cr-00020-CDL-MSH-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus STACIE E. LEIPOLD, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia ________________________ (December 15, 2016) Before ROSENBAUM, JULIE CARNES and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 15-15683 Date Filed: 12/15/2016 Page: 2 of 2 Jonathan Dodson, appointed counsel for Stacie E. Leipold in this direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Leipold’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.