USA v. Terrance Reid, No. 15-13054 (11th Cir. 2016)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Case: 15-13054 Date Filed: 02/29/2016 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 15-13054 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-00465-ODE-ECS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus TERRANCE REID, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia ________________________ (February 29, 2016) Before WILSON, ROSENBAUM, and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges. Case: 15-13054 Date Filed: 02/29/2016 Page: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Terrance Reid appeals his 13-month sentence, imposed for violating his supervised release by possessing and using controlled substances. The district court committed no procedural error by discussing treatment options available to Reid before imposing the sentence: the court, as a matter of law, was required to impose some imprisonment; and nothing in the record indicates that rehabilitation (for example, by means of some course of treatment) was a reason for the length of the sentence. To the extent that Reid faults the court simply for discussing rehabilitation and treatment options at sentencing, the doctrine of invited error precludes his argument on appeal: Reid’s counsel introduced the topic at the hearing. Moreover, for the court to discuss rehabilitation at sentencing is not error. See United States v. Vandergrift, 754 F.3d 1303, 1311 (11th Cir. 2014). AFFIRMED. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
