United States v. Williams, No. 12-15313 (11th Cir. 2013)
Annotate this CaseDefendant appealed his convictions for drug and firearms possession charges. The court concluded that the district court did not err by denying defendant's motion to suppress because the district court made a proper credibility finding and completed a sound Fourth Amendment analysis in light of the facts that it reasonably found; there was sufficient evidence to convict defendant of possessing a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime under 18 U.S.C. 924(c)(1)(A); and any error in the district court's application of Batson v. Kentucky was harmless. Accordingly, the court affirmed defendant's convictions and sentences.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.