United States v. Yeary, No. 11-13427 (11th Cir. 2014)
Annotate this CaseDefendant appealed his sentence and convictions of drug and firearms charges. Defendant raised several issues on appeal. The court concluded that the district court did not err in denying defendant's motion to suppress three searches because the first search at issue was a valid protective sweep; in regards to the second search at issue, defendant agreed to a warrantless search of his residence; and in regards to the third search at issue, the lessee of the property voluntarily consented to the search. The court concluded that defendant's remaining challenges were without merit. Accordingly, the court affirmed the judgment of the district court.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.