United States v. Rodriguez, No. 10-12065 (11th Cir. 2014)
Annotate this CaseDefendant pled guilty to conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud, mail fraud, and wire fraud. Defendant's convictions stemmed from her involvement in a mortgage fraud scheme. The court concluded that there was no evidence or indication that defendant was unable to consult with her attorney or understand the advice offered to her. As such, no error was committed by the district judge in determining that defendant was competent to enter a plea of guilty. The court concluded that her plea was knowing and voluntary. The court concluded that the district court did not err in finding defendant responsible for over $12 million in losses and thus imposing a twenty-level sentencing enhancement. The court upheld the district court's two-level enhancements for use of sophisticated means and multiple victims. Based on the record before the district court and the non-specific nature of defendant's objections, the court could not say that the district court's restitution order was based upon insufficiently specific and clear factual findings. Accordingly, the court affirmed defendant's guilty plea, sentence, and restitution order.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.